Heather Mills' A Gold-digger, her credibility questioned!

6 votes

The judge who decided the loot in the Heather Mills-Paul McCartney divorce slammed the shrill-ionaire amputee today in a ruling, saying that Mills' claims of being rich before Paul were "wholly exaggerated," and that she wasn't as "charitable" in her giving as she claimed.Justice Hugh Bennett called Mills a "less than impressive witness" in his 56-page ruling, largely because several of her claims were "not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid." Paul, on the other hand, was deemed "consistent, accurate and honest." He feels fine even though lost the legal battle and his pocket picked by ex-wife Heather Mills.

And it sounds like Heather's lucky she got as much as she did, because her argument that she was rich before Paul, and that that her marriage to him squeezed her own earning potential, sounded specious at best to the judge. What's more, while Heather said that she gave 80% to 90% of her earnings to charity, documents she submitted "disclose no charitable giving at all."
Mills fired her legal team earlier and chose to represent herself. Mills said her savings on legal fee would be used for charity.

Mills' new lawyers had strenuously tried to keep the ruling from being revealed, citing safety concerns for the ex-couple's kid Beatrice. But looks like Heather's credibility is the only thing being threatened.

410 ladysluvar Published 3/18/08 Message Add to Friends

Add Your Comment

Comments (1)

I think anyone who's a Beatles fan is obligated to hate Heather Mills, but she really makes it easy for us! I can't think of many people who are more vile than she is.

3751 Jebbica 3/18/08 Message Add to Friends Reply

Your email address (will not be published, but is required):

Your comment:

No links or abusive language please!
Add Comment